You have guest access to browse, login, or register.

Reply to this topic
Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 01:54 am

[LanMan]
LanMan

Total posts: 80
Quicken Deluxe 2006
Windows XP
I noticed that the Patient History screen report diffently when choosing Medical History vs. Medication History. Medication History produces a very nice total at the bottom of the screen. Whereas, Medical History does not produce any totals at all. Nor does it list any prices for services, etc. Why is this the case? Should prices and totals be added to this report?
Replies:
 

[Antonio, Quicken]
Intuit Employee

Total posts: 78
Quicken Premier 2006
This is a new post #1
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 02:01 am 
Reply to this message  
The Cost Calculator report will give you the totals that you are looking for. :-)
________________________________________

Remember that, to help others trying to answer your question, you should visit the "User Preferences" link at the top middle of any forum page, and visit the "My Profile" link, and fll out the form.

This is a User-to-User community forum. If you came for help, please have a look around and see if maybe you have the answer that might be able to help someone else while you wait for your answer. :)

Intuit Employee's using the forum can be identified by the name "Quicken " followed by a red Q. Unless a poster has the above requirements they are not an Intuit employee.

0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No

[LanMan]

Total posts: 80
Quicken Deluxe 2006
Windows XP
This is a new post #2
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 02:10 am 
Reply to this message  
Okay, I get it. Whenever I really want a total for something that I need to go to the CC rather that Find/History reports. The totals on some reports, other than the CC, are really mostly icing on the cake. I simply thought that some more UI consistency throughout the reports would be nice. I'm just trying to figure out what one report function provides vs another.

Thanks for the feedback, Antonio and Bruce. :)

0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No

[bifrap]

Total posts: 52
Number of years using Quicken: 2 to 5 years
Quicken Medical Expense Manager V1
Windows XP
This is a new post #3
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 02:22 am 
Reply to this message  
If I can add my "two cents": I almost think that the term "medical history" is misleading. For some individuals (esp. those dealing with chronic illnesses/ disabilities) have medical histories that do not necessarily have direct cost implications tied to a specific action/date of service. It's an important distinction to make.

MEM is a quantitative, financial software tool for managing medical exenses. It is NOT, unfortunately, comprehensive software for COMPLETE household medical managment. I certainly hope that this is the long-term goal of the MEM product team (hint, hint)!!!! Otherwise, some of us will NEVER be able to have "everything" in one place. I'm in better shape but still need to have files, multiple systems, etc.

Barrie

If this link works, here's the original discusssion on this topic:

<url>http://www.quickenforums.com/thread.jspa?forumID=1022&threadID=600006704&messageID=600035851#600035851</url>

Re: Vaccination History

Posted on: Feb 8, 2006 9:31 PM, by user: bifrap

Show all results within this thread.

bifrap

www.familialdysautonomia.org

www.keshet.org
0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No

[apwilhelm]
Illinois
Total posts: 1302
Voted helpful: 10
Number of years using Quicken: 2 to 5 years
Quicken Premier 2007
Windows XP
This is a new post #4
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 03:10 am 
Reply to this message  
Okay, I get it. Whenever I really want a total for


something that I need to go to the CC rather that


Find/History reports. The totals on some reports,


other than the CC, are really mostly icing on the


cake. I simply thought that some more UI consistency


throughout the reports would be nice.


I agree that more consistency would be nice, but for me that means removing the dollar values from the Medication History. A History report should be one that I should have no qualms about showing any of my providers, but it is my belief that the provider has know business knowing how much I paid for what. Perhaps it's my small-town background showing through, but a provider knowing this type of financial history can affect how you are treated and billed in some communities.

I'm just


trying to figure out what one report function


provides vs another.






Thanks for the feedback, Antonio and Bruce. :)


-Tony

0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No

[Bruce, Quicken]
Intuit Employee

Total posts: 73
Quicken Medical Expense Manager V2
This is a new post #5
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 03:43 am 
Reply to this message  
Excellent points.

Barrie, you hit the nail on the head. We called it a "patient history" instead of a "medical history" for just that reason -- it shows expense-related items, i.e. appointments and prescriptions, with their related billing and medical notes. Good enough for some people, not nearly as much as some could use. (hint taken)

Tony, we missed the point that people might not *want* to have financial info showing on medications. (And yes, LanMan, this wasn't consistent.) Since this information is available elsewhere (i.e. in Cost Calculator), maybe we should leave that out of Patient History in future versions.

And now that you've gotten me to thinking... it would probably help to let you include or exclude billing and medical notes in Patient History print-outs; you might want one or the other but not both.

Thanks, as always,

Bruce

P.S. You three are all regulars who know this... but it may be worth mentioning for new/prospective people cruising the forums that MEM is a finished product, even if it's still evolving.

:-)

In other words, I'm proud of it, but I'm always looking for ways to improve it.

0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No

[LanMan]

Total posts: 80
Quicken Deluxe 2006
Windows XP
This is a new post #6
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 04:58 am 
Reply to this message  
Bruce, you and the QMEM should be proud. Don't take my feedback as criticism. My comments merely reflect my way of viewing things, and I wanted to see what others might think. While there is always room for improvement, or one persons wants/needs differ from others the QMEM product is very nice and has helped me a great deal already. That is really a high compliment as I am a new user. I can now see a clear picture of my medical expenses (not really a pretty picture), and that's very helpful. I may actually get a post-FSA funds tax deduction this year! ;)

0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No

[Bruce, Quicken]
Intuit Employee

Total posts: 73
Quicken Medical Expense Manager V2
This is a new post #7
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 05:34 am 
Reply to this message  
By all means, keep your comments coming! You've all made some great points in the forums, and you help other people use MEM better, and you help other people deal with their medical-expense issues better, and you get us thinking about better ways to do stuff -- all great.

I just put that point in the end of my post in case there are prospective customers looking around the forums and saying to themselves, in effect, "I'm not buying that, it's not a finished product". We had a few commen

0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No

[apwilhelm]
Illinois
Total posts: 1302
Voted helpful: 10
Number of years using Quicken: 2 to 5 years
Quicken Premier 2007
Windows XP
This is a new post #8
of 8
Re: Medical History vs. Medication History Totals
Feb 16, 2006 06:12 am 
Reply to this message  
<snip>

We had a


few comments like that a few months ago, that they


thought it was still in beta, which frankly was kind


of crummy because they hadn't seen it and were just


reacting to the (very open) comments in the forums.


Well, also for the benefit of new browsers here, those comments were all aimed at version 1. I don't remember seeing a "this is beta" cry since v2 came out. Anyone can feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but I feel pretty comfortable saying that.

-Tony

0 users found this answer helpful. Did you find this answer helpful? Yes No
 
 
 
 
XML RSS feed
QuickFeeds
Post to Del.icio.us
Digg!
 

In order to post a message, you must login.





Top of page